![]() |
| Image Sourced: Nicole Forrester |
Ever
heard the expression “just Google it?” I know I have had my fair share of
Google moments but what intrigues me the most is that technological jargon is
becoming increasing predominant in our everyday activities and conversations;
playing a much larger role in our lives than I had initially anticipated. With
the development of Web 2.0; a new era of digital culture has been created with
individuals now becoming more aware of how they portray themselves online on
social networking sites. No matter how hard we try to escape from social media,
we normally always return back to these sites within a few days, hours or for
those constantly attached to their phones (like myself) in a few minutes. Furthermore,
aided by advancements in technology, especially since the development of smart
phones, our dependency to be “in touch” with the virtual community is growing;
but with this comes the issue of self-identity associated with social
networking: are we presenting a true image of ourselves online or the image that
society created and wants us to portray?
Marshall
(2010) introduces the term ‘specular economy’ to define how society is becoming
more conscious on how we present ourselves on our social media networks and
thus how others interpret our profiles. In terms of my own personal social
media use, particularly on Facebook, I constantly ‘filter’ my news feed and
approve certain uploads by giving a thumbs up and liking those pictures, images
or status updates and if it has captured my attention then I will make an extra
effort to comment and express my opinion on that particular post. With this
being said, I also acknowledge a friend’s presence by tagging them at a
location which we visited or sharing images or videos that are funny and might
interest them. I myself have been guilty of tweaking a status before posting
(especially with added #hashtags) but never has it occurred to me that I was
doing this on a daily basis; editing my somewhat boring status’ to one that is
more humorous and witty so that although my status has a serious message
attached it comes across as more light-hearted and not sound like a crazy
lunatic make me seem more down to earth. Those who I would consider my
close friends know that I may have a slight (read big) obsession with taking
photos of food before I consume them, although I don’t specifically state this
as a post, my friends on Facebook interpret my photos that I upload on Facebook
or Instagram that I am a ‘foodie’ and loves eating out with friends. Call it
vanity, but in this day and age where we are constantly being judged on our
appearance and “becoming more conscious of how we present ourselves and how
others perceive us” (Marshall 2009, p. 498), personal social networking sites
are no exception and thus, we spend the majority of our time prowling on these
sites editing and observing then expressing our true inner thoughts.
![]() |
| Image Sourced: SquareOne Explorations |
We
live in a narcissistic world where ‘competitive individualism’ exists where we
constantly feel the need to ‘better ourselves’ by comparing our own profiles to
our friends and have a psychological competition with them. Additionally, according
to Lasch (1979), comparable to celebrities, we constantly over analyse how we
should best present ourselves online to highlight what we feel is our defining
feature. We are consciously aware of how we present our profiles and how others
perceive us (especially potential employers). To a certain extent, manipulating
our true selves in order to get a few more ‘likes’ or ‘comments’ to feel accepted
by our fellow ‘friends’. The best example of this is the classic self-portrait “selfie”
shot. According to Hills (2009), the author contends that today’s youth are
utilising mobile digital media technologies more effectively than previous
generations to establish our online identities stressing the ability to take and
upload images almost instantaneously has played a major role in this
development. Furthermore, profile pictures are ‘a short hand for changing,
up-to-the-minute performances of self’ (Hills 2010, p. 118) and one of the
easiest and fastest ways to capture and represent yourself online to provide an
insight to external individuals and companies viewing your profile.
Video Sourced: Youtube Michelle Phan
In
terms of my own experience, although I do not adjust my profile picture on a
regular basis, but they usually consist of a different variation shot of me at
the beach and the odd shameful “selfie.” As hypocritical as it sounds I
do find “selfies” annoying as they in no way represent an accurate depiction of
myself in the flesh. On top of this, Marshall (2010) links celebrity culture to
the development of our online identity and contends that it is an important
factor on how we present ourselves to the world. With this being said, I follow
quite a few celebrities on twitter but mostly for styling, fashion and beauty
related advice. I do believe that celebrities have influenced our online
personas whether sporting a ‘selfie’ profile picture or trying to sport Kim
Kardashian’s signature makeup look, (see video below) has undoubtedly
influenced the way we ‘prune’ ourselves online to our celebrity
counterparts…it’s no coincidence that I tried to recreate this look a few days
later…
Video Sourced: Youtube GossMakeupArtist
Although
my Facebook page is personal I do try to upload pictures that are considered
somewhat formal as well as I am still cautious of future employers browsing my
page. Moreover, profile pictures can say a thousand words but with profile
pictures constantly being uploading and changing is it really an accurate
representation of our real self? After taking a few ‘selfies’ I usually select
the best shot, filter it then upload it. The question is: with all this
editing, is the person in the photo still me? Social
media allows us to feel relevant and important but at the same time also
promotes being egotistical
DiMicco
and Millen (2007) theorise that users of such social media sites present
themselves when they are using one site to keep in contact with both their past
social groups from school and their current social connections in the
workplace. Additionally, with the use of multiple chats on Facebook I am able to
communicate with my workplace regarding rostering and changing shifts whilst
socialising with my friends and family members in a separate chat all in one
place. The only major difference with these chats is the type of language that
is written in these messages. For work related chats I keep it strictly
professional and regularly edit and re-edit the messages that I send, even
though I use my personal page for work related issues I still maintain work
conduct. For close friends and family members on the other hand, not as much
thought is taken when typing, editing and sending as I am able to keep it
casual and humorous in my messages without inciting emotional responses. Chalkley
(2013) and Ellison et al. (2007) both imply that the next challenge of innovation
will not be more advanced phones or even faster data but rather our definitions
of ‘friends’, ‘community’ and ‘society.’ Furthermore, Ellison (2007) contends
that with the technological developments with the internet it can have positive
and negative effects on the individual. I myself still wonder out of all the
500 ‘friends’ I have on Facebook, I only talk to about 10 on a regular basis
and whilst I may get a few likes on every status that I post (although
infrequently) I can still feel lonely at the same time; as our ‘online
identity’ quickly expands will our real identity get lost in the process of the
online realm?
Vanity and self-admiration occurs not just online but is observed just as
often in our daily routines. Livingstone (2008) states that while younger
teenagers relish opportunities to recreate ‘highly-decorated and
stylistically-elaborate’ identities, older teenagers favour simple aesthetic backdrops
which allows the true notion of identity lived through authentic relationships.
If analysed on a deeper level, although these
arguments are valid it may not be completely true. As human beings we thrive on
social interaction offline and online and always trying to seek the approval of
others. Yes, we may develop deeper connections from friends to the workplace
but in order to do so we change and alter our demeanour and appearances. In
order to maintain professional and personal connections one must dress the
part. I know for a fact that I would not be caught dead in my work uniform
around my friends and vice versa in thongs at work.
Although
such social sites are meant to be used as a tool to reflect our true identity
we find ourselves getting lost in the process and being replaced by ‘a new and
improved’ version of us. The cyber world
is becoming a vehicle for individuals to create a sense of identity where we
are able to shape shift and alter our personality and appearances to target
specific audiences. While we do in fact do this on a regular basis outside of
the online community, the digital world allows us to enforce this with greater
convenience and precision. Although somewhat deceptive, our freedom to create a
better and improved version of ourselves whether online (via edited ‘selfies’)
or in real life (resumes anyone?) is empowering enabling us to better our
public image. With that being said – how do we separate our real identity to
the one that we virtually construct online?
(On a side note it’s been over a week since I last changed my profile picture on Facebook… I just need to filter and edit a new selfie before I upload it.) #selfies #hashtag #swag #yolo #nailedit #whyamidoingthis?
Video Sourced: Youtube #Hashtag
Bibliography
Chalkley, T 2013, ‘Teen identity in the digital age: who exactly is “me” now days?’, conference paper presented at Transformational Communication and the New Asia, Asian Media Information and Communication Centre, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
CONTOUR AND HIGHLIGHT LIKE KIM KARDASHIAN - STEP BY STEP. Video, 7 June 2012, gossmakeupartist, date retrieved: 10 August 2013, <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBLHE0ME-GA>
DiMicco, J. M & Millen, D. R 2007, ‘Identity management: multiple presentations of self in Facebook’ in Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work, New York, pp. 383-386
DiMicco, J. M & Millen, D. R 2007, ‘Identity management: multiple presentations of self in Facebook’ in Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work, New York, pp. 383-386
Ellison et al. 2007, ‘The Benefits of
Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social
Network Sites’, Journal of
Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1143-1168
Hills, M 2009, ‘Case study: social networking and self-identity’, in Creeber, G and Martin, R (eds.), Digital Cultures: Understanding New Media, Open University Press, Maidenhead, pp. 117-21
How to take the perfect selfie 2013, YouTube, Michelle Phan, 5 September, retrieved 22 September 2013,<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbqIQcKNE7E&feature=c4-overview&list=UUuYx81nzzz4OFQrhbKDzTng>
Lasch, C 1979, Culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York: Norton
Livingstone, S 2008, ‘Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression’ in New media & society, volume 10, no. 3, pp. 393-411
Marshall, P D 2010, ‘The promotion and
presentation of the self: celebrity as marker of presentational media’, Celebrity
Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35-48
Marshall, P.D 2010, ‘The Specular
Economy’, Society, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 498-502
#Hashtag with Jimmy Fallon and Justin Timberlake 2013, video, Youtube, 24 September, retrieved 10 October 2013, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57dzaMaouXA







